Filter

Motor manufacturers associated – in suing motor manufacturers

Now this is a picture with some context. What we see is a meeting of engineers in 1910. To be more specific, the caption tells us the following: “Clubs – Association of Licensed Automobile Manufacturers. ALAM engineers met and drove each other’s cars in 1910, exchanged many ideas.”

Now isn’t that sweet, and isn’t that just what colleagues are for? One big bunch of like-minded motor manufacturers.

But perhaps there is another, not quite so supportive, side to the story. Look up the Association of Licensed Automobile Manufacturers and you will soon find that the association was born out of a number of muddy lawsuits over automobile patents from patent lawyer George B. Selden. Selden had been granted a patent for the manufacture of the automobile as early as 1895, demanding royalties on every car built by any motor manufacturer. That’s what the ALAM was all about. No surprise then that it eventually controlled just about the whole industry and profited from it, too: receiving at least 0.75% on every car produced by its members.

 

That is, until Henry Ford was rejected from joining the association in 1903, leading to “a messy public relations battle.” The ALAM in fact even launched a campaign threatening to sue those who purchased Ford automobiles. Ford’s response: “We believe that the art would have been just as far advanced today if Mr. Selden had never been born.”

We are not making this up. This polemic didn’t last long after that statement was published. In January 1911, Ford eventually won the case, and the ALAM seems to have disappeared not long after.

 

Back to the 1910 photo, which remains a gem, even now that we know more of its doubtful background. What do we recognize here?

 

Words: Jeroen Booij
Picture: The New York Public Library

 

Published:
Wednesday November 19th, 2025
Ariejan Bos
19 November 2025, 10:51
It’s hard to imagine that this photo was taken in 1910. What we see is a number of Columbia’s, a Stearns, an Autocar, probably a Stevens-Duryea, a Peerless, a Columbia and some other vehicles which are more difficult to identify. However they all share a production year of around 1904. So either we see a gathering of historic vehicles, but it seems more logical that the year of the photograph is incorrect. Besides 1904 makes more sense, because the ALAM was founded a year earlier and all makes on the photo were part of that organisation. And indeed in Ocober of that year there was an ALAM run, called a comparison run, to Ardsley and Travers Island. A page from The Motor World of 13 October 1904 shows some photos of this event, clearly taken at the same location: compare the bridge!
Read more
Ariejan Bos
19 November 2025, 15:53
Sorry, after the Peerless follows a Pierce.
Read more

Make a comment, ask a question, give your opinion, share additional information or start a discussion by filling in the fields below.


Log in to post your comment directly

Upload images to your reaction